These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Current status of small bowel radiography.
    Author: Maglinte DD, Kelvin FM, O'Connor K, Lappas JC, Chernish SM.
    Journal: Abdom Imaging; 1996; 21(3):247-57. PubMed ID: 8661560.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: In the past, small bowel examinations were usually ordered for the sake of "completeness." As a result, small bowel radiography was performed casually and without attention to detail. This review examines pertinent clinical issues and the recent contribution of small bowel radiography to the evaluation and management of the patient with suspected small bowel disease. Recommendations for the clinical utilization of small bowel radiography are discussed. METHODS: Analysis of pertinent citations addressing valid indications for, and technique of, small bowel radiography from 1980 to July 1995 through a computerized bibliographic search (Medline and Current Contents). RESULTS: Accepted clinical indications for small bowel radiography include (1) unexplained gastrointestinal bleeding, (2) possible small bowel tumor, (3) small bowel obstruction, (4) Crohn disease, and (5) malabsorption. The current literature reflects the limitations of the conventional small bowel follow-through, various modifications to improve its clinical yield, the important contribution of enteroclysis in the workup, and subsequent management of patients with possible small bowel disease. A controversy in the radiology literature exists as to whether to use the small bowel follow-through or enteroclysis as the primary method of examining the small bowel. CONCLUSION: The thoughtful selection of patients by clinicians for small bowel radiography is essential to make radiologic evaluation cost effective. The incidence of disease of the small intestine is low and is associated with nonspecific symptoms. Because of the inherent difficulty of visualizing numerous loops of an actively peristalsing bowel, a reliable imaging method is needed that not only detects small or early structural abnormality but also accurately documents normalcy. The yield of information provided by enteroclysis and its high negative predictive value suggests that it should be the primary method for small bowel examination. The "overhead"-based conventional small bowel follow-through should be abandoned. The "fluoroscopy"-based small bowel follow-through augmented when necessary by the peroral pneumocolon or the gas-enhanced double-contrast follow-through method is an acceptable alternative when enteroclysis is not possible.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]