These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: [Mechanical duodenal stump suture. Report of experiences: metal staples versus resorbable staples]. Author: Tonus C, Böckmann U, Nier H. Journal: Chirurg; 1996 Mar; 67(3):249-53. PubMed ID: 8681699. Abstract: The main observation criterion of the present retrospective study is the insufficiency rate after machine closing of the duodenal stump (TA-clip seam device, Auto-Suture), as a consequence of gastrectomy, resection of the stomach with Billroth II respective Roux-Y reconstruction, depending on the used type of clip. Between January 1, 1985 and October 2, 1989 the closing of the duodenal stump was routinely carried out with metal clips (n = 253) in the City Hospital Offenbach. Between October 3, 1989 and December 31, 1991 polysorb staples (n = 96) were exclusively used. The patient collectives were comparable regarding age, sex, health status, basic diseases, accompanying diseases and surgical methods. Closing of the duodenal stump by polysorb staples demonstrated with 13.5% more dehiscent seams than with metal clips (4.7%). As a result of the present study, we cannot recommend the use of polysorb clips for the closing of the duodenal stump.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]