These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Anterior proliferative vitreoretinopathy in the silicone study. Silicone Study Report Number 10.
    Author: Diddie KR, Azen SP, Freeman HM, Boone DC, Aaberg TM, Lewis H, Radtke ND, Ryan SJ.
    Journal: Ophthalmology; 1996 Jul; 103(7):1092-9. PubMed ID: 8684799.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: As part of the design of the Silicone Study, a new classification of proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) was developed that distinguishes the different types of contraction found in PVR. In contrast to the original Retina Society system that emphasized the post-equatorial retinal pathology (posterior PVR), the Silicone Study classification system included the characteristic types of contraction found in both the equatorial region and the pre-equatorial retina and vitreous base (anterior PVR). METHODS: The authors contrast (1) preoperative and intraoperative findings and (2) vision and anatomic outcomes in the cohort of anterior PVR eyes with the cohort of posterior-only PVR eyes. For the cohort of eyes randomized to perfluoropropane gas (C3F8) or silicone oil, the authors carry out univariate and multivariate analyses to assess the predictive value of baseline and intraoperative parameters on vision and anatomic outcome. RESULTS: Anterior PVR was present in 321 eyes (79%) and was more prevalent in eyes that had undergone an unsuccessful vitrectomy before study entry than in eyes that underwent a primary vitrectomy for PVR (88% versus 73%; P < 0.001). Compared with eyes that had posterior PVR at the preoperative examination, eyes that had anterior PVR tended to (1) be graded (Retina Society classification system) as D-1 or worse (86% versus 49%; P < 0.0001), (2) have worse (< 2/200) visual acuity (93% versus 86%; P = 0.003), (3) have more hypotony (24% versus 11%; P = 0.03), more edema (8% versus 2%; P = 0.04), more aqueous flare (P = 0.02), more macular pucker (69% versus 52%; P = 0.005), and more intravitreal contraction (21% versus 6%; P = 0.002). When compared with eyes that had anterior PVR, eyes with posterior PVR had a better outcome at the 6-month postoperative examination: complete attachment of the retina (76% versus 62%; P = 0.04), visual acuity of 5/200 or better (64% versus 45%; P = 0.006), and normal intraocular pressure (86% versus 71%; P = 0.04). For eyes with anterior PVR, significant predictors of poor (< 5/200) visual acuity were a preoperative PVR grade D-1 or worse and the use of C3F8 gas as the intraocular tamponade. CONCLUSION: The Silicone Study classification of anterior PVR permits greater specificity in characterizing PVR and is prognostic of anatomic and vision outcome. Eyes with anterior PVR and clinically significant posterior PVR changes had a better visual prognosis if silicone oil was used. With the current understanding of the pathoanatomy of anterior PVR and the recent development of new surgical techniques, the incidence of anterior PVR in eyes that previously underwent vitrectomy may decline, and the prognosis in eyes with anterior PVR may improve.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]