These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction versus T2-weighted spin-echo MR imaging in the follow-up of colorectal neoplasm: a prospective study of 41 patients.
    Author: Kinkel K, Tardivon AA, Soyer P, Spatz A, Lasser P, Rougier P, Vanel D.
    Journal: Radiology; 1996 Aug; 200(2):453-8. PubMed ID: 8685341.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: To compare dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction (DCES) and T2-weighted spin-echo (SE) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the differentiation of fibrosis from recurrence during the follow-up of treated colorectal neoplasms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-one patients with 39 malignant and 16 benign lesions confirmed by means of surgery (n = 23), biopsy (n = 24), or 12-month follow-up examination (n = 8) underwent DCES MR imaging and T2-weighted SE MR imaging. Enhancement of an abnormal pelvic structure within the first 90 seconds on DCES images or high signal intensity on T2-weighted SE images was considered indicative of malignancy. RESULTS: Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were, respectively, 97%, 81%, 93%, and 100% for DCES MR imaging and 77%, 56%, 81%, and 56% for T2-weighted MR imaging. The number of correctly classified lesions was significantly higher with DCES imaging compared with T2-weighted imaging (P < or = .006). CONCLUSION: DCES imaging is more accurate than T2-weighted SE imaging for differentiating fibrosis from recurrence during the follow-up of treated colorectal neoplasms.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]