These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Atypical cervix uteri smears--consequences?].
    Author: Nielsen MN, Hølund B, Nielsen B, Ejersbo D, Holm K.
    Journal: Ugeskr Laeger; 1996 May 20; 158(21):2985-6. PubMed ID: 8686036.
    Abstract:
    Among 37,992 cervical smears (725 (1.9%)) were found to be atypical. All atypial smears were referred for colposcopically guided biopsies and cervical abrasio within three months. This is an expensive and cumbersome procedure. In order to obtain a more differentiated follow-up procedure the atypical smears were divided into two groups without knowledge of the later histological diagnosis on biopsy: "Atypia, probably reactive" and "atypia, probably CIN (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia)". In the latter group the subsequent biopsies showed significantly more CIN than in the former (60.4% against 15.7%). We find it useful to divide the atypical smears into two groups in our daily routine work with a different follow-up procedure: "Atypia, probably reactive" to be followed by a repeat smear and "atypia, probably CIN" to be followed by colposcopically guided biopsies and cervical abrasio.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]