These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Loss of transactivation and transrepression function, and not RPA binding, alters growth suppression by p53.
    Author: Leiter LM, Chen J, Marathe T, Tanaka M, Dutta A.
    Journal: Oncogene; 1996 Jun 20; 12(12):2661-8. PubMed ID: 8700525.
    Abstract:
    The tumor suppressor protein p53 activates transcription from promoters with specific p53 binding elements, represses transcription from promoters without such elements and interacts with and inhibits the single-stranded DNA binding activity of the human DNA replication factor RPA. All these activities involve the N terminal 70 amino acids of p53. Dissection of the domains of p53 which bind RPA suggest that multiple sub-domains of the protein synergize to give strong RPA binding. Point-mutations in one of these sub-domains of p53 significantly diminish its ability to interact with RPA. A multimer of a peptide from p53 which includes these residues, or of a peptide from the acidic activation domain of the prototypic trans-activator protein VP16, can itself bind to RPA. Comparison of sequences of these multimeric peptides suggests that aromatic amino acids flanked by negatively charged residues are important for binding RPA. Several alleles of p53 with point mutations in the N terminal region were analysed for their relative abilities to bind RPA, activate or repress transcription, and suppress growth of p53 null SaOs2 and H1299 cells. Both mutants of p53 with decreased RPA binding suppressed cell growth as well as wild-type p53, suggesting that p53 can suppress growth without interacting with RPA. The allele that lost most of the transcription activation function also lost most of its transcription repression activity suggesting that interaction with the same basal transcription factors are involved in both functions. This same allele bound RPA well but was defective in growth suppression. Therefore, transcription activation and/or repression appear to be more important for the growth suppression function of p53 than RPA binding.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]