These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Extremely low-birth-weight children and their peers. A comparison of school-age outcomes.
    Author: Halsey CL, Collin MF, Anderson CL.
    Journal: Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 1996 Aug; 150(8):790-4. PubMed ID: 8704883.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To document 7-year developmental and educational outcomes in a cohort of predominantly white, middle-class, extremely low-birth-weight (ELBW, < 1000 g) children to address the incidence of increased developmental disability and the need for special educational services. DESIGN: Observational study. PATIENTS: Fifty-four ELBW children and 58 comparison children, who were matched for race, gender, and socio-economic status (30 with low birth weights [1500-2500 g] and 28 with birth weights > 2500 g). The ELBW cohort was drawn from 104 presurfactant survivors born between 1984 and 1986 and cared for in a single hospital. SETTING: Suburban, university-based tertiary referral center. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Teachers' reports of classroom placement and special education services and tests of cognitive, motor, language, and visual-motor integration abilities were studied. RESULTS: Twenty-seven (50%) of 54 ELBW children were in regular classrooms with no special services compared with 21 (70%) of 30 in the low-birth-weight group and 27 (93%) of 28 in the full-term group, indicating a significant trend toward increasing need for special services with decreasing birth weight across the 3 groups (P < .001). The ELBW group scored significantly lower than the comparison groups on all tests, although generally within the average range. Seventy-nine percent of ELBW children had average cognitive scores, but they averaged 14 to 17 points lower than the 2 comparison groups. Twenty percent of the ELBW children had significant disabilities including cerebral palsy, mental retardation, autism, and low intelligence with severe learning problems. CONCLUSIONS: Even with optimal socioeconomic environments, 20% of ELBW children are significantly disabled, and 1 of every 2 ELBW children requires special educational services. Objective testing pinpointed weakness on all measures compared with matched peer groups.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]