These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Antifungal susceptibility testing using the E test: comparison with the broth macrodilution technique. Author: Chen SC, O'Donnell ML, Gordon S, Gilbert GL. Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother; 1996 Feb; 37(2):265-73. PubMed ID: 8707736. Abstract: The National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards reference broth macrodilution method for antifungal susceptibility testing was compared with the E test by testing 86 clinical isolates of Candida spp. and Cryptococcus neoformans. The MIC agreement rates for the two methods for Candida spp. were 73-89% within +/-1 doubling dilution and 87-100% within +/-2 dilutions. For C. neoformans, agreement within +/-1 dilution was > 70% for all the agents tested except fluconazole for which agreement was 35%. Our data support the further evaluation of the E test as an alternative method for antifungal susceptibility testing. However, E test MICs of fluconazole for C. neoformans, particularly C. neoformans var. gattii should be interpreted with caution, as falsely elevated MICs may occur.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]