These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Allogeneic blood cell transplants for haematological malignancy: preliminary comparison of outcomes with bone marrow transplantation.
    Author: Russell JA, Brown C, Bowen T, Luider J, Ruether JD, Stewart D, Chaudhry A, Booth K, Jorgenson K, Coppes MJ, Turner AR, Larratt L, Desai S, Poon MC, Klassen J.
    Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant; 1996 May; 17(5):703-8. PubMed ID: 8733685.
    Abstract:
    Twenty-six patients with haematological malignancy received cryopreserved but otherwise unmanipulated blood cell transplants (BCT) from five- or six-antigen matched siblings in whom progenitor cells had been mobilized by G-CSF. Outcomes were compared with a historical control group of 26 BMT patients matched for age and disease status. Granulocyte counts recovered to 0.5 x 10(9)/l in a median of 16 days after BCT compared with 21.5 days after BMT (P = 0.0002). Platelet counts, unsupported for 3 days, reached 20 x 10(9)/l in a median of 14 days vs 20.5 days (P = 0.0003) after BCT compared with BMT in those patients who engrafted. In the BCT and BMT groups, respectively, the risk of grade II-IV acute GVHD was 37 vs 21% (P = 0.16) and of chronic GVHD at 1 year 53 vs 48% (P = 0.9). There was no significant difference in red cell transfusions but BCT patients required fewer platelet transfusions (median 3 vs 5, P = 0.015) and fewer days in hospital (20.5 vs 25, P = 0.02). These results indicate that allogeneic BCT from matched and partially mismatched family donors result in faster engraftment than BMT without a significant increase in GVHD. Allogeneic BCT may prove to be a more tolerable procedure than BMT for both donor and recipient and there are indications of improved cost-effectiveness.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]