These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Serum neuron specific enolase (S-NSE) reference interval evaluation by time-resolved immunofluorometry compared with a radioimmunoassay.
    Author: Jørgensen LG, Løber J, Carlsen NL, Momsen G, Hirsch FR.
    Journal: Clin Chim Acta; 1996 May 30; 249(1-2):77-91. PubMed ID: 8737594.
    Abstract:
    The serum neuron specific enolase (S-NSE; EC 4.2.1.11) reference interval was evaluated by DELFIA (Wallac) in 161 healthy blood donors and the method compared with the S-NSE RIA assay (Pharmacia). The DELFIA assay total analytical variation coefficient (CV%) was between 3.7% and 6.6%., the RIA CV% 7.6% to 13.1%. Late centrifugation (after hours) increased the variation as a result of contamination with blood cells. Log transformation into a gaussian distribution was selected by Box-Cox analysis and tested by two models: the gauss-distribution and the Refval transformation. The 95% reference intervals and corresponding 90% confidence intervals were: female 2.9-9.6 micrograms/l (2.6-3.2 and 8.5-10.7) micrograms/l and male 3.4-11.7 micrograms/l (3.0-3.8 and 10.2-13.2 micrograms/l). Mean values were significantly different (P < 0.001), female 5.3 (4.9-5.6), male 6.3 (5.8-6.7) micrograms/l. The serum NSE levels were analysed with both methods in a population of 110 patients. The results were significantly correlated (coefficient, 0.9896; r, 0.99; P < 0.0001-two tailed). For high S-NSE values (> 150.0 micrograms/l) differences between the methods exceeded the mean difference + 2S.D., while low concentrations were interconvertible. Maximal diagnostic efficacy was 0.91 for both assays, in DELFIA 17.2-23.9 micrograms/l and for RIA 17.2-21.9 micrograms/l. Identical sensitivity, specificity, discriminative power score, and likelihood ratio were found. The two methods are consequently interconvertible.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]