These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Detection of hepatic metastases: ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging versus unenhanced MR imaging and CT during arterial portography.
    Author: Senéterre E, Taourel P, Bouvier Y, Pradel J, Van Beers B, Daures JP, Pringot J, Mathieu D, Bruel JM.
    Journal: Radiology; 1996 Sep; 200(3):785-92. PubMed ID: 8756932.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: To prospectively compare the diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography (CT) during arterial portography (CTAP) with that of unenhanced and ferumoxides-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging at 0.5 T in the detection of hepatic metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four pairs of radiologists independently assessed the metastatic involvement of 134 hepatic segments (31 with and 103 without metastasis) in 17 patients at unenhanced and ferumoxides-enhanced spin-echo and gradient-echo MR imaging (alone and in combination) and at CTAP. The diagnostic performance of the various imaging modalities was assessed by means of receiver operating characteristic analysis. RESULTS: The accuracy of CTAP, unenhanced MR imaging (combined unenhanced sequences), and ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging (combined contrast material-enhanced sequences) was 0.925, 0.908, and 0.951, respectively. Ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging was significantly more accurate (P < .05) than unenhanced MR imaging and CTAP. When 14 segments containing cysts were excluded, the difference between ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging and CTAP was no longer statistically significant (P = .1). CONCLUSION: Ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging is more accurate than unenhanced MR imaging and at least as accurate as CTAP for the detection of hepatic metastases.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]