These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: [Aortic valve replacement with pericardial bioprosthesis in patients under 60 years of age. Experience over 10 years]. Author: Aupart M, Hammami S, Sirinelli A, Dreyfus X, Meurisse Y, Marchand M. Journal: Ann Chir; 1996; 50(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 8761106. Abstract: Between July 1984 and December 1993. 110 patients, younger than 60 years, underwent aortic valve replacement with a Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valve. 75.5% were male, with a mean age of 49.6 years (range: 16 to 59 years). Mean clinical status was 2.25. Operative mortality was 0%. All patients but 3 were followed up with a total follow-up of 454 patient-years and an average of 4.8 years. The 10-year actuarial survival is 91 +/- 6%. We observed 8 valve-related complications (1.7% patient-years): 3 cases of endocarditis, 3 structural failures, 1 thromboembolic event, and 1 perivalvular leak. 1 patient died from a valve-related cause, and 2 reoperations were necessary. The 8-year actuarial probability of absence of valve-related death is 99 +/- 1%, thromboembolism 98 +/- 2%, endocarditis 96 +/- 4%; reoperations 96 +/- 4%, and valve failure 97 +/- 3%. The 10-year valve-related complication rate is satisfactory, but the durability of the prosthesis in this group of young patients remains unknown. A longer follow-up is mandatory to draw definitive conclusions.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]