These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Speech-specific cortical potentials--methodologic aspects and initial clinical results].
    Author: Rosanowski F, Hoppe U, Moser M, Tigges M, Eysholdt U.
    Journal: Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Jun; 75(6):326-9. PubMed ID: 8766377.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to find out whether specific cortical potentials can be evoked and identified after word stimulation. The clinical relevance was to be investigated in patients with aphasic syndromes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 20 young adults with no signs of hearing impairment and in patients with manifest aphasic syndromes, word-evoked cortical potentials were compared with those after an equivalent noise stimulus. The test words were selected from the Freiburger Speech Comprehension Test. The duration of the words was between 450 and 640 ms. The stimulus was presented monaurally. The peak level was 70 dB HL. The noise stimulus was produced by modifying a low-band noise. Potentials were measured between the ipsilateral mastoid and the contralateral forehead. Data were analysed offline. RESULTS: In healthy persons, the potentials after word and noise stimulation did not differ until 100 ms after the stimulus onset. After noise stimulation a negative maximum could be seen 100 ms after the stimulus onset, and a positive maximum 200 ms after the stimulus onset. After word stimulation, a positive maximum of higher amplitude than after noise stimulation was measured 150 ms after the stimulus onset, and a negative maximum was measured 270 ms after the stimulus onset. In all test persons the difference curve of word-and noise-evoked potentials revealed a speech-specific component 170 ms (N 170) after the stimulus onset. The single-word analysis showed that the potentials depend on the phonemes of the test word. The potentials do not alter when the stimulus side is changed. In patients with aphasia the potentials depend on the grade of the disturbance of speech perception: global and Wernicke's aphasia show no significant difference of speech-and noise-evoked potentials, whereas in Broca's aphasia a speech specific maximum is apparent. CONCLUSION: The speech-specific component may be regarded as a paradigm of cortical speech detection processes. Electrophysiological speech audiometry by means of word-evoked cortical potentials seems possible and may be used for clinical purposes.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]