These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Quantification of dementia-related disabilities in daily behavior with the DAFS (Direct Assessment of Functional Status): reliability and validity of a German test version].
    Author: Hochrein A, Jonitz L, Hock C, Bell V, Plaum E, Engel RR.
    Journal: Z Gerontol Geriatr; 1996; 29(3):216-22. PubMed ID: 8767019.
    Abstract:
    The DAFS (Direct Assessment of Functional Status) is a new test for the assessment of competence of demented patients in situations of everyday life. The present study assesses objectivity, temporal stability, concurrent and discriminative validity of a German version of the DAFS. Sixteen patients with a DSM-III-R-diagnosis of dementia of the Alzheimer's type, 8 of which with a mild (MMSE 18-25) and 8 with a moderate (MMSE 12-17) dementia, and 8 control subjects without any symptoms of dementia (MMSE 28-30), matched with the patient groups in age, gender and education, were assessed three times within 3 weeks with the DAFS and once with the NOSGER (an ADL rating scale). The DAFS showed high objectivity (correlation between two test administrators r = .97) and stability (2 week retest reliability r = .98) and was able to discriminate significantly between the study groups and with a strong effect size. Correlations with the total score and the IADL subscale score of the NOSGER were high (r = .81 and r = .86, resp.), whereas correlations with the mood and the disturbing behavior subscale were much lower (both r = .54). This investigation could demonstrate that the DAFS is an objective, stable and valid test instrument. It has a high power to discriminate between demented and non-demented subjects as well as between various degrees of severity of illness. The test items are highly relevant for everyday functioning and the test itself is a good and necessary addition to the use of ADL or IADL rating scales.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]