These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Fibrinolytic treatment with ultra-high streptokinase infusion via the dorsalis pedis vein offers no advantage over systemic infusion via the brachial vein in patients with deep vein thrombosis of the leg. Author: Martin M, Heimig T, Fiebach BJ, Riedel C. Journal: Vasa; 1996; 25(3):275-8. PubMed ID: 8795307. Abstract: The present study into the fibrinolytic therapy of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) considers whether streptokinase infusion into the dorsalis pedis vein of the affected leg (ipsipedal infusion) yields higher lysis rates than systemic infusion via the brachial vein (systemic infusion). In both cases the dosage regimen selected was a short-term ultra-high streptokinase (UHSK) infusion of 1.5 million IUSK/hour over a period of 6 hours (total SK dose: 9 million IU). A series of one to three UHSK infusions was given on one to three consecutive days. Forty patients were randomised to either systemic (Group S) or ipsipedal (Group IP) treatment. The distribution of important parameters determining a fibrinolytic response (e.g. the age, site and extent of DVT, and number of UHSK infusion series) was virtually identical in the two treatment groups. The rates for total and partial thrombolysis in the systemic infusion group were 50% and 10% respectively compared with 30% and 20% respectively in the ipsipedal group. The distribution of side-effects was approximately identical in the two groups. The results show that ipsipedal UHSK lysis via the dorsalis pedis vein confers no advantage over systemic infusion via the brachial vein.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]