These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Technetium 99m-labeled tetrofosmin myocardial tomography in patients with coronary artery disease: comparison between adenosine and dynamic exercise stress testing.
    Author: Cuocolo A, Nicolai E, Soricelli A, Pace L, Nappi A, Sullo P, Cardei S, Argenziano L, Ell PJ, Salvatore M.
    Journal: J Nucl Cardiol; 1996; 3(3):194-203. PubMed ID: 8805739.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Pharmacologic coronary vasodilation with adenosine, combined with myocardial scintigraphy, is a useful test for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients unable to exercise. It has been demonstrated recently that exercise 99mTc-labeled tetrofosmin cardiac imaging can be used for the detection of CAD. However, no data are available comparing 99mTc-labeled tetrofosmin adenosine and exercise tests in the same patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: The results of adenosine and exercise 99mTc-labeled tetrofosmin myocardial tomography were compared in 41 patients (37 men and four women; mean age 53 +/- 8 years) with suspected or known CAD who underwent coronary angiography. All patients were submitted, on separate days, to three injections of 99mTc-labeled tetrofosmin (740 MBq intravenously): one at rest, one during bicycle exercise, and one during adenosine infusion (140 micrograms/kg/min for 6 minutes with injection of 99mTc-labeled tetrofosmin at 4 minutes). A total of 902 myocardial segments were analyzed quantitatively. One patient had normal coronary vessels, 19 patients had single-vessel CAD, 12 patients had two-vessel CAD, and nine patients had three-vessel CAD (> 50% coronary stenosis) on coronary angiography. Adenosine induced a significant increase in heart rate (88 +/- 16 beats/min at peak vs 72 +/- 11 beats/min at rest; p < 0.01). Systolic and diastolic blood pressure was not significantly different after adenosine infusion compared with rest. Double product was 22931 +/- 7039 at peak exercise and 11229 +/- 3413 after adenosine (p < 0.01). Agreement on the presence of abnormal single-photon emission computed tomography by adenosine and exercise was 100% by quantitative analysis. In all segments a significant relationship between exercise and adenosine 99mTc-99m-labeled tetrofosmin uptake was observed (r = 0.90; p < 0.001). Segmental agreement for regional 99mTc-labeled tetrofosmin uptake score between exercise and adenosine was observed in 737 (82%) of the 902 segments (kappa value of 0.66). Concordance between the two studies for identification of perfusion status was observed in 809 (90%) of the segments (kappa value of 0.80). Sensitivity and specificity for detection of stenosed vessels were not different for dynamic exercise stress testing and adenosine 99mTc-labeled tetrofosmin cardiac tomography. CONCLUSIONS: Despite different hemodynamic effects, adenosine and dynamic exercise 99mTc-labeled tetrofosmin single-photon emission computed tomographic imaging provides similar information in the diagnosis and localization of CAD.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]