These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: A Mono-Percoll separation technique improves sperm recovery of normal and male factor specimens when compared with the swim-up technique. Author: Shalika S, Dugan K, Pelesh D, Padilla S. Journal: Hum Reprod; 1995 Dec; 10(12):3195-7. PubMed ID: 8822442. Abstract: The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of a simplified 80% Mono-Percoll sperm separation procedure on both normal and male factor semen samples compared with the standard swim-up technique. The parameters examined include sperm concentration, motility and morphology, total motile functional spermatozoa and percentage recovery. Normal patients demonstrated enhanced sperm parameters with the Mono-Percoll compared with the swim-up technique for concentration (67 x 10(6) versus 42 x 10(6)/ml, P < 0.001), motility (66 versus 59%, P < 0.001), morphology (56 versus 49%, P < 0.005) and percentage recovery (60 versus 42%, P < 0.005). Male factor patients showed enhanced sperm parameters with the Mono-Percoll procedure compared with the swim-up technique for motility (53 versus 42%, P < 0.05) and percentage recovery (54 versus 29%, P < 0.005), with no significant difference in concentration and morphology. In summary, the Mono-Percoll sperm recovery procedure is significantly better than the swim-up technique for male factor patients and patients with normal sperm parameters.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]