These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Comparison of growth of masking functions and speech discrimination abilities in younger and older adults.
    Author: Cheesman MF, Hepburn D, Armitage JC, Marshall K.
    Journal: Audiology; 1995; 34(6):321-33. PubMed ID: 8833312.
    Abstract:
    This study examined the possibility that age-related differences in speech discrimination abilities may reflect individual differences in the amount of masking and in the rate of growth of on- and off-frequency masking. Young (mean age = 26 years) and older (mean age = 60 years) adult listeners were selected, all of whom had hearing thresholds equal to or better than 30 dB HL at audiometric frequencies < or = 2000 Hz and equal or better than 40 dB HL at audiometric frequencies from 3000 to 6000 Hz. Listeners were tested on a consonant identification task in which nonsense words were presented in quiet, high-pass-filtered, low-pass-filtered and in wide-band noise. Despite their good hearing thresholds, the older listeners made significantly more errors in all four test conditions. Masked thresholds and growth of masking functions were obtained for all listeners at signal frequencies of 750, 1000, and 1500 Hz, in the presence of a one-third-octave band of noise centred at 1000 Hz, with four noise levels from 50 to 80 dB SPL. The older listeners had higher masked thresholds overall, when compared to younger listeners, even though their audiometric thresholds at these frequencies were within normal limits. However, the slope of the growth of masking functions at and above the masker frequency did not differ with age. These results show that older listeners show reduced speech discrimination abilities both in difficult listening conditions and in quiet, even when their pure-tone thresholds are within normal limits. Moreover, these effects cannot be attributed to differences in masked thresholds or in the rate of growth of masking.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]