These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Prevention of postoperative abdominal adhesions by a sodium hyaluronate-based bioresorbable membrane: a prospective, randomized, double-blind multicenter study.
    Author: Becker JM, Dayton MT, Fazio VW, Beck DE, Stryker SJ, Wexner SD, Wolff BG, Roberts PL, Smith LE, Sweeney SA, Moore M.
    Journal: J Am Coll Surg; 1996 Oct; 183(4):297-306. PubMed ID: 8843257.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Postoperative abdominal adhesions are associated with numerous complications, including small bowel obstruction, difficult and dangerous reoperations, and infertility. A sodium hyaluronate and carboxymethylcellulose bioresorbable membrane (HA membrane) was developed to reduce formation of postoperative adhesions. The objectives of our prospective study were to assess the incidence of adhesions that recurred after a standardized major abdominal operation using direct laparoscopic peritoneal imaging and to determine the safety and effectiveness of HA membrane in preventing postoperative adhesions. STUDY DESIGN: Eleven centers enrolled 183 patients with ulcerative colitis or familial polyposis who were scheduled for colectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis with diverting-loop ileostomy. Before abdominal closure, patients were randomly assigned to receive or not receive HA membrane placed under the midline incision. At ileostomy closure eight to 12 weeks later, laparoscopy was used to evaluate the incidence, extent, and severity of adhesion formation to the midline incision. RESULTS: Data were analyzed for 175 assessable patients. While only five (6 percent) of 90 control patients had no adhesions, 43 (51 percent) of 85 patients receiving HA membrane were free of adhesions (p < 0.00000000001). The mean percent of the incision length involved was 63 percent in the control group, significantly greater than the 23 percent observed in patients who received HA membrane (p < 0.001). Dense adhesions were observed in 52 (58 percent) of the 90 control patients, but in only 13 (15 percent) of the 85 receiving HA membrane (P < 0.0001). Comparison of the incidence of specific adverse events between the groups did not identify a difference (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study represents the first controlled, prospective evaluation of postoperative abdominal adhesion formation and prevention after general abdominal surgery using standardized, direct peritoneal visualization. In this study, HA membrane was safe and significantly reduced the incidence, extent, and severity of postoperative abdominal adhesions.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]