These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Pattern electroretinogram, visual evoked potential and psychophysical functions in maculopathy.
    Author: Junghardt A, Wildberger H, Török B.
    Journal: Doc Ophthalmol; 1995; 90(3):229-45. PubMed ID: 8846732.
    Abstract:
    To compare pattern electroretinograms and visual evoked potentials with psychophysical examinations, such as visual acuity, static (automated) perimetry and color vision in unilateral maculopathies of various origins, 20 patients with unilateral retinal diseases within the macula and the posterior pole were tested. Pattern electroretinography, visual evoked potential testing and static perimetry (Octopus program M1) were performed with three different test field sizes (20 degrees x 20 degrees, 10 degrees x 10 degrees and 6 degrees x 6 degrees). The best correlation in all three test field sizes was found between visual acuity, static perimetry and visual evoked potential. This result is surprising, since central area defined functions (visual evoked potentials, visual acuity) correlated well with a total area integrating function (mean defect in static perimetry. The pattern electroretinogram, which seems to reflect an area-related function as well, showed a correlation to static perimetry only in the smaller 10 degrees x 10 degrees and 6 degrees x 6 degrees fields and not a significant correlation in the 20 degrees x 20 degrees field. Smaller stimulation fields may therefore produce sharper results in pattern electroretinographic testing. There was no correlation between pattern electroretinograms and visual evoked potentials or visual acuity. The pattern electroretinogram was recorded under monocular and binocular viewing conditions. In 60% of the patients, the amplitude of the affected eye was more reduced in the monocular than the binocular viewing condition; the healthy fellow eye controlled stable fixation of the affected eye more readily during binocular pattern electroretinogram registration. The degree of the color vision disturbance (C-index, desaturated panel D-15 test) did not correlate to any of the other examinations.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]