These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Detection thresholds for object motion and self-motion during vestibular and visuo-oculomotor stimulation.
    Author: Kolev O, Mergner T, Kimmig H, Becker W.
    Journal: Brain Res Bull; 1996; 40(5-6):451-7; discussion 457-8. PubMed ID: 8886373.
    Abstract:
    We compared the detection threshold for object motion with that of self-motion in space in healthy human subjects. Stimuli consisted of horizontal rotations of subjects' body with a fixation spot kept in fixed alignment with their heads (vestibular stimulus), rotation of the fixation spot relative to the stationary subjects (visuo-oculomotor stimulus), and a combination thereof by applying rotations of subjects body relative to the stationary object (sinusoidal oscillations, 0.025-0.4 Hz). Two series of experiments were performed. 1) One group of subjects was instructed to attend to, and to indicate the occurrence of, either object or self-motion. 2) A second group was instructed not only to detect the occurrence of a perception, but also to quality it either as object motion or self-motion, depending on which modality dominated perceptually. With either instruction it was found that all three stimulus conditions could evoke both, either an object motion perception or a self-motion perception. The detection thresholds of both perceptions were essentially similar. Thresholds were highest with the vestibular stimulus, intermediate with the stimulus combination, and lowest with the visuo-oculomotor stimulus. The vestibular threshold depended on stimulus frequency, in that it decreased with increasing frequency. Thereby, it became similar to the visuo-oculomotor one, which was essentially constant across frequency. Probability of occurrence of the perceptions in the first experimental series was considerably higher than in the second series, suggesting an important role of attentional mechanisms. In the second series, percent frequency of occurrence of veridical perception (object motion with visuo-oculomotor stimulus, self-motion with stimulus combination) was at chance level (50%) at low stimulus frequency, but was augmented considerably at high frequency. We assume that the latter effect is brought about by a visual-vestibular conflict measure by which the visual stimulus (light spot) is qualified as representing either a moving object or a spatial reference for self-motion. While at suprathreshold stimulus intensities the conflict can determine perception magnitude, at threshold levels its influence is restricted mainly on the probability of occurrence of object and self-motion perception.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]