These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Comparative effects of exposure to different light sources (He-Ne laser, InGaAl diode laser, a specific type of noncoherent LED) on skin blood flow for the head.
    Author: Pöntinen PJ, Aaltokallio T, Kolari PJ.
    Journal: Acupunct Electrother Res; 1996; 21(2):105-18. PubMed ID: 8914685.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the effects of optic stimuli emitted by three different light sources on head skin blood flow. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The irradiation effects of the He-Ne laser (632.8 nm, 10 mW, total energy appr. 9.4 J), the InGaAl diode laser (670 nm, 60 mW, appr. 108 J) and monochromatic light (635 nm, 112.5 mW, appr. 202.5 J) were measured using laser Doppler technology. The corresponding fluences (energy densities) varied from 0.01 J/cm2 (He-Ne) to a range of 0.12-0.72 J/cm2 (InGaAl) and 0.22-1.36 J/cm2 (LED). The investigation was completed under single-blind, placebo-controlled conditions where the subjects (10 male healthy volunteers) were exposed on two occasions to the placebo (LED)-device against the laser (He-Ne or InGaAl). RESULTS: A short lasting vasodilation, a 54 per cent increase (p < 0.05) in skin blood flow was seen after the InGaAl irradiation (fluences between 0.12-0.36 J/cm2) whereas the non-coherent monochromatic irradiation (0.68-1.36 J/cm2) used in this particular study decreased blood flow by 36 per cent (p < 0.05). The He-Ne irradiation (0.01 J/cm2) had no effect. Skin temperature changes were insignificant. CONCLUSIONS: Skin blood flow changes seemed to be related more on radiant exposures then coherency.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]