These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Simultaneous dobutamine stress echocardiography and dobutamine scintigraphy (99mTc-MIBI-SPET) for assessment of coronary artery disease.
    Author: De Bello V, Bellina CR, Molea N, Talarico L, Boni G, Magagnini E, Matteucci F, Giorgi D, Lazzeri E, Bertini A, Romano MF, Bianchi R, Giusti C.
    Journal: Int J Card Imaging; 1996 Sep; 12(3):185-90. PubMed ID: 8915719.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Simultaneous dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) and 99Tc-MIBI-SPET (DMS) for the evaluation of the presence and the extent of coronary artery disease (CAD) were assessed for a head to head comparison regarding the diagnostic acuracy of the two rests. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty-five consecutive patients (33 males and 12 females: 53 +/- 6.8 yr.) underwent exercise electrocardiography and simultaneous dobutamine stress echocardiography and MIBI-SPET imaging. Coronary angiography was performed in all patients (significant coronary stenosis > 50%). On the basis of the results of exercise electrocardiogram the pre-test probability for coronary artery disease (Diamond's algorithm) was low (45.6 +/- 12.7%). The overall specificity, sensitivity and predictive accuracy of Echo-dobutamine stress test for diagnosis of the presence or absence of CAD were: specificity 82%, sensitivity 76%, diagnostic accuracy 80%, positive predictive value 90%, negative predictive value 40%. The overall specificity, sensitivity and predictive accuracy of MIBI-SPET-dobutamine test for diagnosis of the presence or absence of CAD were: specificity 86%, sensitivity 87%, diagnostic accuracy 84%, positive predictive value 97%, negative predictive value 54%. MIBI-SPET-dobutamine test showed a significantly higher sensitivity in comparison with ECHO-dobutamine test (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Both noninvasive methods for the detection of CAD showed a good diagnostic accuracy. Nevertheless the SPET model showed a higher sensitivity in comparison with DSE model, essentially in the presence of a lower extent of CAD and during submaximal test.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]