These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Influence of the restorative technique and new adhesives on the dentin marginal seal and adaptation of resin composite Class II restorations: an in vitro evaluation.
    Author: Dietschi D, De Siebenthal G, Neveu-Rosenstand L, Holz J.
    Journal: Quintessence Int; 1995 Oct; 26(10):717-27. PubMed ID: 8935115.
    Abstract:
    The aim of the present in vitro study was to evaluate the marginal adaptation and seal of direct and indirect (inlay) Class II resin composite restorations made with Z100/Scotchbond MP or Herculite/Optibond. The quality of margins in dentin was assessed for restorations made with or without a lining of glass-ionomer cement or resin-modified glass-ionomer material. The restored teeth were submitted to thermocycling and then to replication for scanning electron microscopic observation and to a dye infiltration test. In the present test conditions, the inlay technique proved its superiority over the direct restorative method. The quality of the dentinal margin of restorations made with Z100/Scotchbond MP appeared also slightly better. Both the glass-ionomer cement and the resin-modified glass-ionomer material, when applied as a lining, increased leakage and downgraded marginal adaptation. The full bonding with modern adhesives appeared to be the most efficient way to enhance the marginal quality of both direct and indirect restorations.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]