These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Excretion of urinary N-telopeptides reflects changes in bone turnover during ovarian suppression and indicates individually variable estradiol threshold for bone loss.
    Author: Dmowski WP, Rana N, Pepping P, Cain DF, Clay TH.
    Journal: Fertil Steril; 1996 Dec; 66(6):929-36. PubMed ID: 8941057.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of N-telopeptides and E2 in monitoring bone turnover during GnRH agonist- (GnRH-a) or danazol-induced hypoestrogenism. DESIGN: Comparative, nonrandomized prospective study. SETTING: Institute for the Study and Treatment of Endometriosis. PATIENT(S): Premenopausal women undergoing ovarian suppression with GnRH-a (n = 16) or danazol (n = 9). INTERVENTION(S): Serum and urine samples were collected and bone mineral density was measured before, during, and after treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): N-telopeptide excretion, serum E2, and bone mineral density at L1 to L4 and femoral neck. RESULT(S): During treatment in the GnRH-a group, mean E2 levels were 53% below and N-telopeptides were 38% above the mean baseline. At 1 month post-treatment, L1 to L4 bone mineral density decreased by 3.85%. In the danazol group, E2, N-telopeptides and L1 to L4 bone mineral density changed nonsignificantly in the opposite direction with the mean 1.25% increase in L1 to L4 at 1 month post-treatment. In combined groups, L1 to L4 bone mineral density better correlated with other measures than femoral neck bone mineral density. N-telopeptide excretion was more predictive of L1 to L4 change, with correlation the highest between N-telopeptides at month 4 and bone mineral density at month 1 afterward, while E2 appeared more predictive of the less reliable femoral neck bone mineral density. Individual exceptions to the model of an E2 threshold for bone loss were observed. Also noted were high correlation between on-therapy levels of E2 and N-telopeptides, as well as the presence of a 1-month time lag between E2 and N-telopeptide changes. CONCLUSION(S): Bone density decreases during GnRH-a and may slightly increase during danazol treatment. However, E2 threshold for bone loss varies individually. N-telopeptides predict changes in bone mineral density at L1 to L4 better than E2.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]