These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Finite element analysis of ceramic abutment-restoration combinations for osseointegrated implants.
    Author: Papavasiliou G, Tripodakis AP, Kamposiora P, Strub JR, Bayne SC.
    Journal: Int J Prosthodont; 1996; 9(3):254-60. PubMed ID: 8957860.
    Abstract:
    All-ceramic restorations can solve many esthetic problems associated with implant-supported prostheses. This study evaluated stress concentration and distribution in implant abutments under normal masticatory forces using computer simulations. Two-dimensional finite element analysis was used to study four different abutment-restoration combinations using Brånemark implants. The models considered two positions of the fastening screw, two positions of the crown margins, cemented versus screw-retained prostheses, and clinical loads of 200 N. Models having screws on top of abutments had the lowest stresses (3.1 to 4.8 MPa) and best stress distribution. Screw-retained prostheses and short crown margins increased overall stresses (9.9 to 11.4 MPa).
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]