These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Radiation burden in invasive cardiac diagnosis: extent, factors of influence and references for minimizing radiation dosage].
    Author: Kuon E, Lang E.
    Journal: Z Kardiol; 1996 Aug; 85(8):543-52. PubMed ID: 8975494.
    Abstract:
    Despite great effort concerning quality control in diagnostic radiology, there exist only a few studies giving reliable details about x-ray exposure during heart-catheterization. The mean radiation dose-area product of 100 patients (male 65%, middle-aged 60.7 +/- 10.4 years) investigated was irrespective the technique according to Sones or Judkins 45.2 +/- 14.7 Sv x cm2. In comparison to an optimated x-ray chest the local x-ray entrance-expositions in case of changing (90 mSv) and constant (300 mSv) projections were 300- and 1000-fold respectively. Concerning the dose-area product and the effective dose the multiplicative factor reached 160 and 100 respectively. Radiation entrance-exposure during cinematography was 15-fold as during x-ray-examination sequences. The cinematographic radiation dose was influenced significantly by location of the contrasted coronary artery (p < 0.001) and plane of projection (p < 0.001): intensive in entrance surface dose were projections x-raying spinal column and sternum (RCA in PA- and LCA in LAO-projection). Independent variables were body mass index (BMI, p < 0.001) and sex (p < 0.005), but not age. X-ray-dose of heart catheterization was lower in women than in men, this fact being only significant in the elderly (> 60 years), indicating an effect of postmenopausal osteoporosis. An effective minimization of x-ray exposition in heart catheterization can be realized by avoiding needless cine-sequences (25-35%), rotating out bone structures of the x-ray beam ( < or = 22%) and reduction of overweight (BMI 35 > 23 kg/m2: 25-35%).
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]