These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Comparison of technetium-99m-sestamibi scintimammography with contrast-enhanced MRI for diagnosis of breast lesions.
    Author: Tiling R, Sommer H, Pechmann M, Moser R, Kress K, Pfluger T, Tatsch K, Hahn K.
    Journal: J Nucl Med; 1997 Jan; 38(1):58-62. PubMed ID: 8998151.
    Abstract:
    UNLABELLED: Scintimammography using 99mTc-sestamibi and contrast-enhanced MRI were performed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of either method in the diagnostic workup of patients suspicious for breast tumors. METHODS: Fifty-six patients (42 with indeterminate mammograms) underwent preoperative prone planar scintimammography and pre- and postcontrast-enhanced MRI. Visually determined signal increase after application of Gd-DTPA was compared with visually scored sestamibi uptake, and the diagnoses of both methods were correlated with the final histopathologic results. RESULTS: Overall, sensitivity and specificity of scintimammography for diagnosing breast cancer were 88% and 83%, respectively. In the subgroup of patients with indeterminate mammograms, sensitivity was 79% and specificity was 83%. MRI readings provided a higher sensitivity (91% with respect to all patients and 89% with respect to patients with indeterminate mammograms), but a considerably lower specificity (52% in both groups) due to contrast-enhancement in different benign lesions. CONCLUSION: Due to its considerably higher specificity, scintimammography rather than MRI may be suitable to reduce the number of breast biopsies which yield benign results. Thus, this method may be suggested as the preferable tool in the diagnostic workup of patients with indeterminate mammographic findings.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]