These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Increased survival after long-term treatment with mibefradil, a selective T-channel calcium antagonist, in heart failure.
    Author: Mulder P, Richard V, Compagnon P, Henry JP, Lallemand F, Clozel JP, Koen R, Macé B, Thuillez C.
    Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol; 1997 Feb; 29(2):416-21. PubMed ID: 9014998.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVES: We sought to investigate the effects of mibefradil on survival, hemodynamic variables and cardiac remodeling in a rat model of chronic heart failure (HF) and to compare these effects with those of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor cilazapril. BACKGROUND: The use of calcium channel blocking agents in chronic HF has been disappointing. Most studies have shown that these drugs have either no or even detrimental effects due in part to the negative inotropic effects they induce. Mibefradil is a calcium channel blocker that selectively blocks T channels and displays moderately negative inotropic properties only at high doses. Because T channels are upregulated in the hypertrophied heart and could mediate hypertrophic signals and increase arrhythmogenicity, blockade of these channels might be beneficial in chronic HF. METHODS: Rats were subjected to coronary artery ligation and 9 months of treatment with mibefradil (15 mg/kg body weight per day) or cilazapril (10 mg/kg per day) or no treatment. Survival and systolic blood pressure were assessed over the 9-month treatment period, after which cardiac hemodynamic variables and structure were determined. RESULTS: Mibefradil increased survival rate to the same extent as cilazapril (71% for mibefradil vs. 75% for cilazapril and 44% for no treatment). Mibefradil decreased systolic blood pressure, although to a lesser extent than cilazapril. Both treatments decreased left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic and central venous pressures, without any change in the first derivative of LV pressure over time or heart rate. Mibefradil decreased LV weight (although less than cilazapril) without affecting right ventricular weight. Finally, both drugs normalized LV collagen density. CONCLUSIONS: Mibefradil in a rat model improved survival to the same extent as an ACE inhibitor, without impairing LV function, and was associated with a reduction in LV weight and fibrosis. Thus, mibefradil might be beneficial in the treatment of chronic HF.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]