These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Deregulation of cyclin E and D1 in breast cancer is associated with inactivation of the retinoblastoma protein.
    Author: Nielsen NH, Emdin SO, Cajander J, Landberg G.
    Journal: Oncogene; 1997 Jan 23; 14(3):295-304. PubMed ID: 9018115.
    Abstract:
    Inactivation of the retinoblastoma protein (pRB) by mutations or abnormal phosphorylation is a mechanism by which tumour cells can subdue normal growth control. Among molecules involved in control of pRB phosphorylation, cyclin D1 and E have been found to be deregulated and overexpressed in various types of cancers. In order to study the cell cycle regulatory mechanisms in breast cancer, we have analysed the protein expression of cyclin D1 and E in 114 tumour specimens from patients with primary breast cancer using Western blotting. Twenty-five out of 34 tumours with overexpression of cyclin E showed uniform low cyclin D1 expression, and by immunohistochemical analysis of pRB we present evidence for the existence of pRB defects in approximately 40% of these tumours in contrast to no pRB defects in the other group of tumours. This result was supported by a high protein expression of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p16 in 44% of the tumours with high cyclin E and low D1 expression, and all immunohistochemical pRB defect tumours showed a high p16 protein level. Additionally, an abnormal low pRB phosphorylation in relation to a high proliferative activity and loss of heterozygosity of the retinoblastoma susceptibility gene locus were found in all but one tumour with immunohistochemical defect pRB. Interestingly, tumours with high cyclin E and low D1 expression were generally oestrogen receptor negative suggesting a role for cell cycle regulators in the mechanisms leading to oestrogen independent tumour growth. Furthermore, the prognosis differed markedly for the patients in the various groups of tumours, indicating that the heterogeneous nature of breast cancer pathogenesis and the clinical course in part could be explained by different and distinctive sets of cell cycle defects.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]