These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: A comparison of the food composition table-based estimates of dietary element intake with the values obtained by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry: an experience in a Japanese population.
    Author: Moon CS, Zhang ZW, Shimbo S, Hokimoto S, Shimazaki K, Saito T, Shimizu A, Imai Y, Watanabe T, Ikeda M.
    Journal: J Trace Elem Med Biol; 1996 Dec; 10(4):237-44. PubMed ID: 9021675.
    Abstract:
    In order to make quantitative comparison between food composition table-based estimates and instrumental measures by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES), total food duplicates were collected from 232 adult women in 10 study regions in 9 Prefectures in Japan. Daily dietary intake of 5 elements, sodium (Na), potassium (K), phosphorus (P), calcium (Ca) and iron (Fe), were estimated from the weights of food items in each duplicate by use of food composition tables. Parallel to this the intakes were measured by wet-ashing of food duplicate homogenates followed by ICP-AES analysis. Because the emission intensity of K was significantly modified by Na co-present at various concentrations, K was measured after Na concentration was reduced to the value 150 mg/L by dilution. The comparison of the two sets of the results, the estimated values and the measured values, showed that the estimated values were significantly larger than the measured values in the cases of Na, K, Ca and P (the ratio of the estimated to the measured values: 118% for Na, 115% for K, 109% for Ca; and 130% for Fe), whereas the two values essentially agreed with each other in the case of P (ratio: 93%). The differences were too large for any nutritional evaluation to be made when the method of Bland and Altman is applied. The significance of the differences in relation to nutritional evaluation of element intake is discussed.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]