These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Limbus- versus fornix-based conjunctival flaps in combined phacoemulsification and mitomycin C trabeculectomy surgery.
    Author: Berestka JS, Brown SV.
    Journal: Ophthalmology; 1997 Feb; 104(2):187-96. PubMed ID: 9052621.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: The authors compared the effectiveness of limbus- and fornix-based conjunctival flaps in patients undergoing combined phacoemulsification, intraocular lens implantation, and mitomycin C trabeculectomy. METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective review of the records of 52 consecutive eyes of 45 patients who underwent combined surgery with limbus- and fornix-based conjunctival flaps. All surgery was by done by one surgeon on predominantly white patients in a suburban glaucoma subspecialty practice. Seven patients had both limbus- and fornix-based surgery, permitting fellow eye comparisons in these patients. All patients had at least 6 months and a median of 17 months follow-up. None of the eyes that were operated on had undergone intraocular surgery previously. RESULTS: No clinically significant difference in postoperative pressure reduction, bleb survival, or visual acuity was seen between the fornix- and limbus-based groups. Results in the fellow eye comparison subgroups were similar. The mean intraocular pressure decreased from 20.4 mmHg before surgery to a mean of 12.4 mmHg at the last follow-up visit. Forty-seven (90.3%) of 52 eyes had a final best-corrected visual acuity of 20/ 40 or better. Forty eyes (76.9%) no longer needed antiglaucoma medications at the end of follow-up. Five eyes had intraoperative posterior capsule rupture; all of these occurred in the limbus-based group. Shallow serous choroidal effusions were more common in the fornix-based group, but none were clinically significant. No difference in postoperative astigmatism between the limbus- or fornix-based group was seen. Intraoperative pupilloplasty, synechialysis, or postoperative neodymium:YAG capsulotomy had no appreciable effect on final intraocular pressure or bleb survival. Endophthalmitis, aqueous misdirection, or hypotony maculopathy did not develop in any patient. CONCLUSION: The effectiveness of limbus- and fornix-based conjunctival flaps appears to be similar. The limbus-based technique may result in a higher incidence of posterior capsular rupture, but the safety of limbus- and fornix-based flaps is otherwise similar. Combined phacoemulsification and mitomycin C trabeculectomy appears to be safe and effective for treating selected patients with coexisting glaucoma and cataract.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]