These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Conflicting expert opinions from the legal viewpoint].
    Author: Pelz FJ.
    Journal: Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1996 Nov; 90(7):636-9. PubMed ID: 9064938.
    Abstract:
    Medical lability actions do rarely without expert assessment. The basic rule of free evidence recognition applies for the evaluation of conflicting expert assessments which forces the judge to examine closely. It is reported about formal mistakes of an expert assessment and the appropriate handling of different expert assessments.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]