These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Sonographic examination does not predict twin growth discordance accurately.
    Author: Caravello JW, Chauhan SP, Morrison JC, Magann EF, Martin JN, Devoe LD.
    Journal: Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Apr; 89(4):529-33. PubMed ID: 9083307.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To assess the accuracy of estimating birth weight among twins with discordancy (intra-pair difference in actual birth weight of more than 25%) and to determine the relative accuracy of an intra-pair difference in abdominal circumference (delta AC) of 20 mm or more or in estimated fetal weight (delta EFW) of 25% or more for the identification of discordant growth in twins. METHODS: Over a 6-year period, we identified all non-anomalous twin pairs with gestational ages greater than 23 weeks and sonographic examinations within 3 weeks of birth. Ultrasonographic biometry of both twins included AC, head circumference, and femur length; these indices were used to estimate fetal weight by Hadlock's formula. Likelihood ratios, receiver-operating characteristic curves, and prediction limits were applied to assess the accuracy of the two diagnostic methods to predict an abnormal outcome. RESULTS: A total of 242 twin pairs were studied. The mean gestational age among the 21 twins with abnormal growth (30.6 +/- 4.6 weeks) was significantly less than among the 221 twins with normal growth (33.2 +/- 4.0 weeks) (P < .005). The biometric measurements of fetal parts, sonographic estimate of fetal weight, and actual birth weight for both fetuses were significantly less for discordant twin pairs (P < .05). The accuracy of predicting birth weight, as determined by mean error and percentage of the estimate within 10% of the actual weight, was similar between the groups. Receiver-operating characteristic curves showed that both diagnostic tests yielded areas under the two curves not significantly different from the area under the nondiagnostic line (P > .05). Most important, prediction limit calculations indicated that a 90% certainty that the actual birth weight discordance was at least 25% was achievable only if delta AC was 172 mm or greater or delta EFW was 112% or more. CONCLUSION: The most popular current methods (difference in AC or EFW) for predicting discordant growth in twin gestations have limited accuracy when held to a standard for discordance that requires a birth weight difference of at least 25%.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]