These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Effects of chronic high-rate electrical stimulation on the cochlea and eighth nerve in the deafened guinea pig.
    Author: Mitchell A, Miller JM, Finger PA, Heller JW, Raphael Y, Altschuler RA.
    Journal: Hear Res; 1997 Mar; 105(1-2):30-43. PubMed ID: 9083802.
    Abstract:
    This study was undertaken to examine the effects of chronic high-rate stimulation on the eighth nerve and cochlea. Fifty-four male pigmented guinea pigs were deafened and implanted with single ball electrodes in scala tympani. Four groups of animals received chronic electrical stimulation at a level of 5 microCol/cm2/ph for 1000 h as follows: Group A: 1000 Hz, 100 microseconds/ph duration, 100 microA peak; Group B: 250 Hz, 100 microseconds/ph duration, 100 microA peak; Group C: 2750 Hz, 36 microseconds/ph duration, 250 microA peak; Group D: 250 Hz, 400 microseconds/ph duration, 25 microA peak. Also, two control groups received 20 min stimulation during weekly electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (eABR) measurement (Group E) and about 5 s stimulation (Group F) during a brief eABR 3 day postimplantation and at perfusion. On Day 50, animals were perfused, midmodiolar sections cut and a quantitative assessment of spiral ganglion cells (SGC) performed. All stimulated subjects showed a similar decrease in eABR thresholds and dynamic range over time. No stimulation conditions induced pathology. All stimulation conditions enhanced survival of SGCs compared to unimplanted ears and implanted non-stimulated ears (Group F). There were no statistically significant differences in SGC survival between any stimulated groups, including Group E stimulated once a week. In conclusion, high-rate stimulation, under the conditions of this study, provides no additional risks and the same benefits to SGC survival as low-rate stimulation.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]