These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Modeling pressure-flow relations in cardiac muscle in diastole and systole.
    Author: Vis MA, Sipkema P, Westerhof N.
    Journal: Am J Physiol; 1997 Mar; 272(3 Pt 2):H1516-26. PubMed ID: 9087630.
    Abstract:
    Pressure-flow relations were calculated for a symmetrical, maximally dilated, crystalloid-perfused coronary vascular network embedded in cardiac muscle in (static) diastole and (static) systole at two muscle lengths: slack length and 90% of maximal muscle length (Lmax). The calculations are based on the "time-varying elastance concept." That is, the calculations include the mechanical properties of the vascular wall and the (varying) mechanical properties of the myocardial tissue (in cross-fiber direction). We found that, at any given perfusion pressure, coronary flow is smaller in systole than in diastole. Relative reduction in vascular cross-sectional area, which forms the basis of flow impediment, was largest for the smallest arterioles. At a constant perfusion pressure of 62.5 mmHg, the transition from (static) diastole to (static) systole at constant muscle length ("isometric contraction") was calculated to reduce flow by 74% (from 18.9 to 5.0 ml x min(-1) x g(-1)) and by 64% (from 12.6 to 4.6 ml x min(-1) x g(-1)) for the muscle fixed at slack length and 90% of Lmax, respectively. At this perfusion pressure, contraction with 14% shortening (from 90% of Lmax in diastole to slack length in systole) was calculated to reduce flow by 61% (from 12.6 to 5.0 ml x min(-1) x g(-1)). Increasing muscle length from slack length to 90% of Lmax decreases coronary flow by 34% in diastole and by 8% in systole. We conclude that modeling cardiac contraction on the basis of the time-varying elastic properties of the myocardial tissue can explain coronary flow impediment and that contractions, with or without shortening, have a larger effect on coronary flow than changes in muscle length.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]