These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: [Predictive value of cervical-vaginal prolactin in the evaluation of premature labor risk].
    Author: Jotterand AD, Caubel P, Guillaumin D, Augereau F, Chitrit Y, Boulanger MC.
    Journal: J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1997; 26(1):95-9. PubMed ID: 9091552.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the presence of cervico-vaginal prolactin during pregnancy is significantly associated with preterm delivery. STUDY DESIGN: A cohort of 64 pregnant women between 21 and 34 weeks of amenorrhea underwent a washing of the exocervix and vaginal fornices with a normal saline solution. The fluid was then aspirated and centrifuged. Samples were stored at -70 degrees C and later prolactin level was determined by radioimmunoassay. Test was considered as positive for a prolactin concentration higher than 2 ng/ml. Statistical analysis were realized by Student's t test, Fisher's exact test and chi 2 test. RESULTS: In patients with preterm labor, positive cervico-vaginal prolactin had a positive predictive value of 36% and a negative predictive value of 94% for a preterm delivery before 34 weeks of gestation (respectively 45% and 79% before 37 weeks). The sensitivity of a positive test was 31% for preterm delivery before 37 weeks of gestation and specificity was 87% (respectively 57% and 88% before 34 weeks). Patients with a positive prolactin test had a significantly shorter latency between testing and delivery (33.7 days vs 52.4 days; p < 10(-9)). No delivery occurred during the following weeks for patients with a negative prolactin test and, among those, only one delivery occurred during the second week following the test. Positive prolactin tests correlated with a mean cervical dilatation of 1 centimetre at the time of testing, while it was of 0.6 centimetre for patients with a negative prolactin test. CONCLUSIONS: Cervico-vaginal prolactin seems to be a non convincing marker for preterm delivery but indicative of a shorter latency from testing to delivery in symptomatic patients. Further investigations are necessary to evaluate accuracy of cervico-vaginal prolactin as a biochemical marker for imminent delivery in patients with preterm labor.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]