These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Anterior instrumentation of the thoracolumbar spine. A biomechanical comparison.
    Author: Dick JC, Brodke DS, Zdeblick TA, Bartel BD, Kunz DN, Rapoff AJ.
    Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1997 Apr 01; 22(7):744-50. PubMed ID: 9106314.
    Abstract:
    STUDY DESIGN: To evaluate the fatigue strength and stiffness of four anterior thoracolumbar fixation devices using a corpectomy model without load-sharing bone graft to test the devices under the worst case scenario of instability. OBJECTIVES: To gain a more thorough understanding of the biomechanical qualities of anterior fixation devices to improve clinical application and design. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: For many surgeons, the anterior approach has become the treatment of choice for patients with compression of the spinal cord, whether it is caused by trauma, tumor, or infection. When stabilization is needed, anterior fixation devices have been advocated for many years to avoid the additional approach required for posterior fixation. Many of these devices, however, have an unacceptably high rate of hardware failure. Recently, several new devices for anterior fixation have been marketed with purported advantages in fatigue life and ease of use. METHODS: Four implants, the Synthes Anterior Thoracolumbar Locking Plate, the Kaneda device, a Texas Scottish Rite Hospital anterior construct, and the Z-Plate were attached to vertebral models and tested for stiffness in multiple planes on a modified Materials Testing System machine. They then were fatigued to failure on an Instron testing machine. RESULTS: The Anterior Thoracolumbar Locking Plate was the stiffest in axial compression, lateral flexion, and torsion. The Texas Scottish Rite Hospital anterior construct was the least stiff in flexion-extension, with no significant differences in the stiffness of the anterior thoracolumbar locking plate, that of the Kaneda device, and that of the Z-Plate. Fatigue life exceeded 80,000 cycles for the anterior thoracolumbar locking plate and averaged 26,472 cycles for the Z-Plate, 6915 cycles for the Teas Scottish Rite Hospital construct, and 4419 cycles for the Kaneda device. CONCLUSIONS: The significantly greater fatigue life of the Anterior Thoracolumbar Locking Plate and the Z-Plate may predict a lower incidence of hardware failure than with previous anterior devices. This has been confirmed in preliminary clinical studies with the Z-Plate. Further clinical studies are needed to show if these lower failure rates will continue over a long-term period.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]