These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Posterior decompression and stabilization for spinal metastases. Analysis of sixty-seven consecutive patients.
    Author: Bauer HC.
    Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1997 Apr; 79(4):514-22. PubMed ID: 9111395.
    Abstract:
    The neurological function, survival, and rehabilitation of sixty-seven consecutive patients who had been managed operatively for spinal metastases with epidural compression were assessed. The epidural compression was in the thoracic spine in forty-one patients and in the lumbar spine in twenty-six. According to the system of Frankel et al. for the assessment of neurological function, twenty-six patients had a major neurological deficit (grade B or C), thirty-two had a minor deficit (grade D), and nine had no deficit (grade E). None of the patients had an operation to treat a pathological vertebral fracture without epidural compression. The operative treatment included wide decompression through a posterior approach followed by stabilization without bone-grafting. A Cotrel-Dubousset device was used in thirty-two patients; an Olerud posterior fixator, in sixteen; an Isola device, in twelve; and another device, in seven. The most common complication was wound infection (eleven patients). There were no perioperative or immediate postoperative deaths (within fourteen days). The rate of survival was 51 per cent (thirty-four of sixty-seven) at six months and 22 per cent (fifteen of sixty-seven) at twelve months. Over-all, forty-four of the fifty-eight patients who had had a neurological deficit preoperatively had complete or partial neurological recovery within the first two weeks postoperatively. The nine patients who had not had a neurological deficit preoperatively retained normal neurological function postoperatively. Thirty-eight of the forty-four patients who were alive at three months and twenty-nine of the thirty-four who were alive at six months were still able to walk. Thirty-nine of the forty-nine patients who survived more than two months were able to return home for a median of seven months. Fourteen patients had a reoperation on the spine. Six of these patients had recurrent epidural compression at another level of the spine, and five had recurrent compression at the previously treated level. Three patients had a reoperation because of loosening of the implant. The results of this study suggest that neurological function can be maintained or improved by decompression and stabilization through a posterior approach as treatment for spinal metastases.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]