These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Efficacy of bidirectional fiber-optic phototherapy for neonatal hyperbilirubinemia.
    Author: Tan KL.
    Journal: Pediatrics; 1997 May; 99(5):E13. PubMed ID: 9113970.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of fiber-optic phototherapy using the standard Ohmeda Biliblanket, a large version, double standard Biliblankets, and conventional phototherapy using daylight fluorescent lamps in full-term, healthy infants with nonhemolytic hyperbilirubinemia. METHODS: Full-term, healthy infants with nonhemolytic hyperbilirubinemia (bilirubin concentration, >255 micromol/L or 222 micromol/L at <48 hours of age) were allocated randomly to one of four modes of phototherapy: standard fiber-optic mat (Ohmeda Biliblanket), a large version, double standard Biliblankets, and conventional phototherapy. Bilirubin levels were monitored every 12 hours. Exposure was stopped when bilirubin levels were less than 185 micromol/L, the minimum duration being 24 hours. RESULTS: A total of 171 infants were studied; 42 were exposed to standard fiber-optic phototherapy, 43 to large fiber-optic phototherapy, 42 to double-fiber-optic phototherapy, and 44 to conventional phototherapy. Durations of exposure were 87.05 +/- 6.09 (SEM), 82.57 +/- 5.84, 64.85 +/- 5.43, and 62.61 +/- 3.74 hours, respectively; the 24-hour decline rates were 10.26% +/- 1.84%, 14. 50% +/- 1.53%, 21.82% +/- 1.71%, and 19.00% +/- 1.65%, respectively; the overall decline rates over the whole exposure period were 0.47% +/- 0.03%, 0.52% +/- 0.04%, 0.71% +/- 0.05%, and 0.75% +/- 0.04% per hour, respectively. The efficacy of double-fiber-optic phototherapy and conventional phototherapy was similar and significantly better than that of the large fiber-optic mat and the standard fiber-optic mat in duration, 24-hour decline rate, and overall decline rate. The large mat was slightly better than the standard-size mat with regard to 24-hour decline rate and overall decline rate, but this difference was not significant. Failure of phototherapy occurred only in the large fiber-optic mat group (3 of 43) and the standard fiber-optic mat group (4 of 42); none occurred in the other two groups, but differences not statistically significant. The nursing personnel were more comfortable with single fiber-optic phototherapy, which caused no initial disturbance to the swaddled infants as did conventional phototherapy, but found double-fiber-optic phototherapy difficult to use. CONCLUSION: For efficacy of fiber-optic phototherapy in full-term infants to be comparable to that of our conventional phototherapy, the light dose of the standard mats needs to be doubled.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]