These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: HDR and MDR intracavitary treatment for carcinoma of the uterine cervix. A prospective randomized study.
    Author: el-Baradie M, Inoue T, Inoue T, Murayama S, Tang JT, Yamazaki H, Fournier-Bidoz N.
    Journal: Strahlenther Onkol; 1997 Mar; 173(3):155-62. PubMed ID: 9122857.
    Abstract:
    AIM: Treatment of carcinoma of the uterine cervix by remote afterloading brachytherapy has been accompanied with new isotopes having dose rates different from the classical low-dose rate (LDR) radium source. The dose rate conversion factor from LDR to high-dose rate (HDR) found to be around 0.54 in most studies. As regards medium-dose rate (MDR) brachytherapy, the published data are very few and the experience is still short. In this study the experience of Osaka University Hospital with micro-HDR-Selectron and Selectron-MDR, as a preliminary report of the clinical trial, is presented. PATIENTS AND METHOD: From August 1991 through April 1993, a total of 45 patients with carcinoma of the uterine cervix were randomly allocated to either microSelectron-HDR or Selectron-MDR at the Osaka University Hospital. As regards HDR, dose to point A was adjusted to 32 Gy (for stages I and II). 30 Gy/4 fractions, and 22.5 Gy/3 fractions, for stages III, and IV, respectively. The corresponding values in case of MDR were 35.6, 34 Gy/4 fractions, and 25.5 Gy/3 fractions. External irradiation, according to the stage, was the same in the 2 groups. Nucletron Planning System (NPS) was used for pre-treatment dose calculation at point A, rectal and bladder wall. The dose rate at point A ranged from 24 to 75.6 cGy/min for the HDR group, while for the MDR group ranged among 174.8 to 229.6 cGy/h. RESULTS: The 3-year survival and loco-regional control rates for both modalities were nearly equivalent (62% and 67% for HDR and 68% and 74% for MDR). The cumulative rectal and bladder complication rates were the same in both groups (29% at 3 years), with only 1 patient (MDR-group) developed grade 3 rectal and bladder complication. In this study, point A dose rate correction factor from LDR to HDR was 0.53 and 0.6 from LDR to MDR. CONCLUSIONS: From the previous reports from Osaka University Medical School, as well as others, HDR was proposed as an alternative to LDR brachytherapy for treatment of carcinoma of the uterine cervix. In this report, Selectron-MDR was nearly equivalent to the microSelectron-HDR as regards survival and loco-regional control rates as well as radiation-induced complication. This is a preliminary report, and the study still needs larger number of patients, and longer follow-up period.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]