These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: A general method for concentrating blood samples in preparation for counting very low numbers of white cells.
    Author: Szuflad P, Dzik WH.
    Journal: Transfusion; 1997 Mar; 37(3):277-83. PubMed ID: 9122900.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: To count extremely low levels of white cells (WBCs) in WBC-reduced blood components, a larger volume of sample must be processed. The goal was to develop an all-purpose method for concentrating the samples obtained from WBC-reduced red cells or platelets. The method was designed to be compatible with a variety of counting techniques. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Coded samples of red cell concentrates with an expected WBC concentration of 200, 100, 50, and 10 per mL and of the diluent (undetectable WBCs/mL) were sent to three sites on five occasions and counted by the use of the concentration method, crystal violet stain, and a Nageotte counting chamber. Additional samples were tested by flow cytometry, polymerase chain reaction, and volumetric capillary cytometry. RESULTS: The results from the three test sites showed good linearity, with an overall r2 = 0.9994. The lower limit of accurate detection of the assay was 10 WBCs per mL. The results were biased toward underestimation, particularly at one of the test sites (Site A). There were no significantly different results in Sites B and C. The intra-assay CV was acceptable. Precision (reproducibility) at the three test sites varied. CONCLUSION: This method allows reliable determination of WBC concentrations as low as 0.01 per microL in blood. Despite the use of technologists trained in Nageotte chamber counting, validation testing demonstrated that one test site's performance was significantly different from that of the other two sites, because of both underestimation bias and variation in count results. The sample concentration method, when used in conjunction with an automated assay for WBC identification, should permit larger volume analysis with a greater degree of precision and a lower limit of detection than is found in assays that do not concentrate the sample before counting.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]