These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Inverse ratio ventilation (I/E = 2/1) in acute respiratory distress syndrome: a six-hour controlled study.
    Author: Mercat A, Titiriga M, Anguel N, Richard C, Teboul JL.
    Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 1997 May; 155(5):1637-42. PubMed ID: 9154869.
    Abstract:
    To assess the cardiorespiratory effects of a prolonged application of inverse ratio ventilation (IRV), we compared IRV (I/E = 2) with conventional ventilation (CV) (I/E = 0.5), applied for 6 h each in a randomized order, with constant tidal volume (VT) and total positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP(tot)) in eight patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). After 1 h, IRV resulted in a lower peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) (28.2 +/- 1.5 versus 35.6 +/- 1.7 cm H2O, p < 0.05), an unchanged plateau pressure, and a higher mean airway pressure (MAP) (17.8 +/- 0.8 versus 15.6 +/- 0.5 cm H2O, p < 0.05) than CV. No significant difference in Pa(O2) and shunt fraction (QS/QT) was observed (83 +/- 7 mm Hg and 40 +/- 4% in CV versus 92 +/- 14 mm Hg and 35 +/- 3% in IRV, respectively). The Pa(CO2) was lower in IRV (48 +/- 3 versus 55 +/- 5 mm Hg, p < 0.05). Cardiac index (CI) and oxygen delivery (D(O2)) were lower in IRV (3.7 +/- 0.4 L/min/m2 and 500 +/- 61 ml/min/m2 versus 4.6 +/- 0.5 L/min/m2 and 617 +/- 80 ml/min/m2, respectively, p = 0.05 for both). Regardless of the considered parameter, no significant difference was observed between results after 1, 2, 4, and 6 h in each mode. We conclude that IRV at a ratio that results in a significant intrinsic PEEP does not improve Pa(O2), enhances CO2 elimination, decreases cardiac output (CO), and does not exert any time-dependent effect.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]