These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: [A comparison of ultrafast computed tomography, magnetic resonance angiography and selective angiography for the detection of coronary bypass patency].
    Author: von Smekal A, Knez A, Seelos KC, Haberl R, Spiegl F, Reichart B, Steinbeck G, Reiser M.
    Journal: Rofo; 1997 Mar; 166(3):185-91. PubMed ID: 9156587.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: Validation of ultrafast-CT and MR-angiography (MRA) in comparison with angiography for detection of early postsurgical arterial and venous coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patency. METHODS: 21 patients with a total of 55 CABG (34 venous and 21 arterial) were studied with angiography, ultrafast-CT (EBT), and MRA. RESULTS: With EBT, patency of 43/45 angiographically patent CABG could be correctly assessed (sensitivity: 96%). With MRA 26 CABG (17 venous and 9 arterial) were identified as patent (sensitivity: 67%). It was not possible to quantify proximal stenosis of three grafts (> 40%) and to evaluate the distal bypass anastomosis with both EBT and MRA. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrafast-CT is a promising minimal invasive screening method for the evaluation of venous and arterial CABG patency. The diagnostic significance of MRA is remarkably reduced.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]