These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Definition and evaluation of a documentation standard for intensive care medicine: the ASDI(Working Group for Standardization of a documentation system for Intensive care medicine) pilot project].
    Author: Metnitz PG, Steltzer H, Popow C, Valentin A, Neumark J, Sagmüller G, Schwameis F, Urschitz M, Mühlbacher F, Hiesmayr M, Lenz K.
    Journal: Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1997 Feb 28; 109(4):132-8. PubMed ID: 9157723.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVES: A comparison of data from different intensive care units (ICUs) needs standardized documentation. In this study the ASDI documentation standard for intensive care was tested in clinical practice. Goal of the study was to evaluate parameters and functionality required for a national, interdisciplinary documentation system for intensive care. DESIGN: 13 ICUs participated in a 4-week trial using the provided program for documentation of all admitted patients during the observation period. In addition, a questionnaire was distributed to the unit coordinators. RESULTS: 376 patients were documented in 1591 patient days. Valid SAPS II scores were found in only 29% of the discharged patients (39.1 +/- 15.5 points). Time needed for data entry exceeded preset limits (ten minutes per patient and day) in 38% of the cases. All participants affirmed the necessity of a documentation standard for intensive care, giving quality control and cost analysis as the most important reasons. CONCLUSION: The ASDI data set fitted existing needs very closely. Only 7 out of 122 parameters (5.7%) were found to be superfluous and thus removed. Measures to reduce documentation effort to the default limits were a) a new, date orientated concept for manual recording, b) rede-sign of the user interface with new, user friendly data entry possibilities, and c) the integration of statistical analysis and reports in the documentation system. The revised data set represents a broad-based consensus, which seems to be well-suited as foundation for the national quality assurance program.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]