These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Gas exchange and cardiovascular kinetics with different exercise protocols in heart transplant recipients.
    Author: Grassi B, Marconi C, Meyer M, Rieu M, Cerretelli P.
    Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985); 1997 Jun; 82(6):1952-62. PubMed ID: 9173964.
    Abstract:
    Metabolic and cardiovascular adjustments to various submaximal exercises were evaluated in 82 heart transplant recipients (HTR) and in 35 control subjects (C). HTR were tested 21.5 +/- 25.3 (SD) mo (range 1.0-137.1 mo) posttransplantation. Three protocols were used: protocol A consisted of 5 min of rectangular 50-W load repeated twice, 5 min apart [5 min rest, 5 min 50 W (Ex 1), 5 min recovery, 5 min 50 W (Ex 2)]; protocol B consisted of 5 min of rectangular load at 25, 50, or 75 W; protocol C consisted of 15 min of rectangular load at 25 W. Breath-by-breath pulmonary ventilation (VE), O2 uptake (VO2), and CO2 output (VCO2) were determined. During protocol A, beat-by-beat cardiac output (Q) was estimated by impedance cardiography. The half times (t1/2) of the on- and off-kinetics of the variables were calculated. In all protocols, t1/2 values for VO2 on-, VE on-, and VCO2 on-kinetics were higher (i.e., the kinetics were slower) in HTR than in C, independently of workload and of the time post-transplantation. Also, t1/2 Q on- was higher in HTR than in C. In protocol A, no significant difference of t1/2 VO2 on- was observed in HTR between Ex 1 (48 +/- 9 s) and Ex 2 (46 +/- 8 s), whereas t1/2 Q on- was higher during Ex 1 (55 +/- 24 s) than during Ex 2 (47 +/- 15 s). In all protocols and for all variables, the t1/2 off-values were higher in HTR than in C, In protocol C, no differences of steady-state VE, VO2, and VCO2 were observed in both groups between 5, 10, and 15 min of exercise. We conclude that 1) in HTR, a "priming" exercise, while effective in speeding up the adjustment of convective O2 flow to muscle fibers during a second on-transition, did not affect the VO2 on-kinetics, suggesting that the slower VO2 on- in HTR was attributable to peripheral (muscular) factors; 2) the dissociation between Q on- and VO2 on-kinetics in HTR indicates that an inertia of muscle metabolic machinery is the main factor dictating the VO2 on-kinetics; and 3) the VO2 off-kinetics was slower in HTR than in C, indicating a greater alactic O2 deficit in HTR and, therefore, a sluggish muscle VO2 adjustment.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]