These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: The safety and efficacy of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in the treatment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and main portal vein obstruction. A prospective controlled study.
    Author: Lee HS, Kim JS, Choi IJ, Chung JW, Park JH, Kim CY.
    Journal: Cancer; 1997 Jun 01; 79(11):2087-94. PubMed ID: 9179054.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) has been contra-indicated for the treatment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and main portal vein (MPV) obstruction because of the potential risk of hepatic insufficiency resulting from ischemia after TACE. The current controlled study was undertaken to assess the safety, efficacy, and predictive factors of favorable response to TACE in patients with HCC and MPV obstruction with good hepatic function and adequate collateral circulation around the MPV. METHODS: Of a total of 47 patients, 31 were treated with TACE, and 16 who declined the procedures were untreated controls. Thirty-six patients (77%) had diffuse-type HCC and 11 (23%) had nodular-type HCC. During the first week after TACE immediate postprocedural complications were evaluated, and the development of hepatic insufficiency as a late complication was assessed at the end of the fourth week. The cumulative survival rate was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and predictors of better prognosis were obtained by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Although no patients showed clinical evidence of hepatic insufficiency as an immediate complication, transient fever and abdominal pain were common. Progressive hepatic insufficiency developed at the fourth week; however, there was no difference between the treated and untreated groups. The survival time of treated patients was statistically no longer than that of untreated patients. In the univariate analysis, tumor type and size, the pattern of iodized oil uptake in the tumor, and the presence of iodized oil uptake in the tumor thrombi at the MPV significantly influenced the prognosis. Tumor type, whether treated or not, was the most important prognostic factor patients with nodular-type HCC had significantly longer survival time (median, 11 months) than those with diffuse-type HCC (median, 4 months). Regarding the efficacy of TACE, there was no statistical difference in survival between treated and untreated diffuse-type HCC patients. In comparison, with nodular-type HCC it seemed that survival time was longer for TACE-treated patients (median, 30 months) than for untreated patients (median, 7 months). CONCLUSIONS: TACE may be a safe modality for the treatment of patients with HCC and MPV obstruction, provided that the patients have good hepatic function and collateral circulation around the MPV. However, TACE was not efficacious in the treatment of diffuse-type HCC. The authors recommend TACE for treating nodular-type HCC because of the potential benefit of prolonged survival.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]