These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Effects of bamiphylline on exercise testing in patients with syndrome X. Author: Lanza GA, Gaspardone A, Pasceri V, Perino M, Colonna G, Tomai F, Crea F, Gioffrè PA, Maseri A. Journal: G Ital Cardiol; 1997 Jan; 27(1):50-4. PubMed ID: 9199943. Abstract: An abnormal stimulation of adenosine A1-receptors has been suggested to play a role in the pathogenesis of both chest pain and ischemia-like electrocardiographic changes in patients with syndrome X and a nonselective adenosine antagonist (theophylline) has been reported to be beneficial in these patients. In this study we investigated the acute effects of bamiphylline, a specific A1-receptor antagonist, in 16 patients with syndrome X (14 women, age 57 +/- 6 years), with both angina and ST-segment depression inducible during exercise testing. All patients underwent two treadmill exercise tests (Bruce modified protocol) on 2 separate days, 5 minutes after the end of randomized intravenous infusion of either placebo (saline solution) or bamiphylline (300 mg). Severity of chest pain was assessed by a 100 mm visual analogic scale. There were no significant differences in resting heart rate and blood pressure after bamiphylline or placebo. Rate-pressure product (20 600 +/- 5000 vs 20 200 +/- 5200 bpm.mmHg), time to 1 mm ST depression (549 +/- 196 vs 581 +/- 201 sec), time to angina (519 +/- 209 vs 571 +/- 196 sec), and exercise duration (717 +/- 134 vs 676 +/- 166 sec) were also not significantly different after bamiphylline or placebo, but there was a mild reduction of the severity of exercise-induced chest pain (30 +/- 22 vs 39 +/- 20 mm, p < 0.05) with the active drug. Thus, in patients with syndrome X, bamiphylline does not improve exercise-induced ST changes, suggesting that A1-receptors are not significantly involved in their appearance. In addition, bamiphylline had little effect on anginal pain, suggesting that this cannot be mediated exclusively by A1-receptor stimulation in these patients.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]