These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Epidemiology of nematodosis in Romney lambs selectively bred for resistance or susceptibility to nematode infection.
    Author: Bisset SA, Vlassoff A, West CJ, Morrison L.
    Journal: Vet Parasitol; 1997 Jul 01; 70(4):255-69. PubMed ID: 9211651.
    Abstract:
    Field trials were undertaken to compare nematode population dynamics, lamb productivity and levels of breech soiling in experimental flocks of Romney lambs selectively bred for increased resistance or susceptibility to nematode infection. In each year of the 2 year study, spring-born ewe lambs derived from Wallaceville Animal Research Centre's divergent nematode-resistant and nematode-susceptible breeding lines were grazed as separate flocks on matched farmlets from weaning (at 3 months old) until they were approximately 10-11 months old. Allocation of farmlets was reversed between Years 1 and 2 of the study to account for any possible paddock-related effects. Within each year both flocks were subjected to identical management conditions, including anthelmintic treatment (which was administered only when the overall mean faecal worm egg count measured across both genotypes reached 1500 eggs g-1). In both years, by mid-autumn (April) nematode larval infestation levels on pasture were approximately 5-6-fold greater on the farmlet grazed by susceptible (S) genotype lambs than on that grazed by their resistant (R) counterparts (Year 1: 2506 cf. 544 larvae kg-1 herbage; Year 2: 431 cf. 74 larvae kg-1 herbage). This led to 51-fold and 56-fold differences in faecal egg count between R and S lambs by late autumn (May) and winter (July) in Years 1 and 2, respectively. Although mean growth rates were similar in the R and S lambs over summer (while pasture infestation levels on the farmlets were still in the process of diverging), significantly higher growth rates occurred in the R than in the S lambs over autumn-winter in both years of the study (P < 0.01). In contrast, no significant differences in growth rate occurred in either year between male lambs derived from the nematode-resistant and nematode-susceptible breeding lines which were grazed together on another area of the Wallaceville farm from weaning until late autumn. Despite the substantially lower pasture infestation levels encountered by the R ewe lambs, they nevertheless temporarily suffered more breech soiling (dags) than their S counterparts (P < 0.01) in both years. Yearling fleece-weights of the R and S genotypes did not differ significantly in either year. Although the results of our study confirmed that there are potentially significant epidemiological benefits to be derived from breeding sheep for resistance to nematode infection, these benefits did not appear to be associated with large advantages in animal performance. Further work is needed to establish how these results should be interpreted with respect to anthelmintic drench requirements of genetically resistant animals.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]