These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Inhibitory effects of efonidipine hydrochloride on contraction induced by several vasoconstrictors in porcine coronary artery: comparison with effects of nifedipine and nisoldipine.
    Author: Higashino R, Sato R, Jin H, Inoue N, Fukuta Y, Kurimoto T, Tamaki H.
    Journal: J Cardiovasc Pharmacol; 1997 May; 29(5):624-30. PubMed ID: 9213205.
    Abstract:
    We studied the effects of efonidipine hydrochloride (efonidipine), a 1,4-dihydropyridine derivative, on contractions induced by high-K+ solution (high K+), serotonin (5-HT), U46619, which is a stable analog of thromboxane A2, and endothelin-1 (ET-1) in comparison with those of nifedipine and nisoldipine in porcine coronary arteries. The effects of the drugs were compared after 1- and 3-h incubations. Efonidipine, nifedipine, and nisoldipine each inhibited the contractions induced by these vasoconstrictors. The inhibition of high-K(+)- and 5-HT-induced contractions by efonidipine, but not by nifedipine and nisoldipine, increased when the incubation time was prolonged, whereas the inhibition of U46619- and ET-1-induced contractions was not altered. The potency of efonidipine on U46619- and ET-1-induced contractions was greater than that of nifedipine and equivalent to that of nisoldipine. Thus the inhibitory effect of efonidipine on U46619- and ET-1-induced contractions seems to be stronger than its effects on high-K(+)- or 5-HT-induced contractions, in contrast to the effects of other dihydropyridines. In an additional series of experiments, efonidipine did not inhibit U46619-induced contractions in Ca2(+)-free solution or in the presence of nifedipine. Moreover, efonidipine did not inhibit the specific binding of [3H]SQ 29,548, a thromboxane A2 antagonist, to porcine coronary arterial membrane. Therefore we think that the inhibitory effect of efonidipine on contractions induced by vasoconstrictors was caused by blockade of Ca2+ influx through L-type Ca2+ channels. However, some unknown mechanism(s) in addition to this effect on Ca2+ channels may contribute to the effect of efonidipine on U46619- and ET-1-induced contractions.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]